Click here to open the filter panel
Click a letter to view all its definitions
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Term of the Day

Natural history study

A natural history study is a preplanned observational study intended to track the course of a disease over time, identifying demographic, genetic, environmental and other variables that correlate with its development and outcomes in the absence of intervention, or under standard of care. Designs may be retrospective (chart review of existing records) or prospective (longitudinal follow-up of a cohort or registry).

Natural history data is particularly important in rare and paediatric diseases, where randomised placebo-controlled trials may be infeasible or unethical. The FDA (guidance on rare disease natural history studies, 2019) and the EMA accept well-designed natural history studies to define endpoints and biomarkers, identify patient subgroups, estimate sample sizes and, in some cases, serve as external or historical control arms for single-arm trials supporting orphan products.

Because they are non-interventional, natural history studies fall outside the CTR and are governed by national law (for example France's MR-003 or MR-004 reference methodologies) and by the GDPR. They typically involve secondary use of medical records, long-term follow-up, genetic data and small populations in which anonymisation is rarely achievable, so pseudonymisation, a DPIA and a robust research legal basis under Art. 9(2)(j) are essential. Registries maintained by patient organisations or academic consortia raise additional questions of joint controllership and data access governance.

F

Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the agency of the US Department of Health and Human Services responsible for protecting public health by regulating human and veterinary drugs, biological products, medical devices, food, cosmetics and tobacco. Its centres most relevant to life sciences are CDER (drugs), CBER (biologics, including cell and gene therapies) and CDRH (devices and diagnostics).

In clinical research the FDA authorises trials through the IND process (21 CFR Part 312) and the Investigational Device Exemption (21 CFR Part 812), sets human subject protection rules (21 CFR Parts 50 and 56, alongside the Common Rule), defines electronic records and signatures requirements (21 CFR Part 11), conducts Bioresearch Monitoring inspections of sponsors, CROs and sites worldwide, and reviews device submissions such as the 510(k) and PMA. It also issues guidance on AI-enabled devices, decentralised trials, real-world evidence and diversity action plans.

The FDA is not a "data protection authority" but it is a major recipient of pseudonymised individual patient data from European trials, through SDTM and ADaM submissions and inspections. The United States has no adequacy decision covering federal agencies, so these disclosures are generally justified under Art. 49(1)(d) GDPR (important reasons of public interest) and must be described in the informed consent form. FDA inspectors' access to source documents at EU sites should likewise be anticipated in the clinical trial agreement and participant information.