Click here to open the filter panel
Click a letter to view all its definitions
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Term of the Day

Natural history study

A natural history study is a preplanned observational study intended to track the course of a disease over time, identifying demographic, genetic, environmental and other variables that correlate with its development and outcomes in the absence of intervention, or under standard of care. Designs may be retrospective (chart review of existing records) or prospective (longitudinal follow-up of a cohort or registry).

Natural history data is particularly important in rare and paediatric diseases, where randomised placebo-controlled trials may be infeasible or unethical. The FDA (guidance on rare disease natural history studies, 2019) and the EMA accept well-designed natural history studies to define endpoints and biomarkers, identify patient subgroups, estimate sample sizes and, in some cases, serve as external or historical control arms for single-arm trials supporting orphan products.

Because they are non-interventional, natural history studies fall outside the CTR and are governed by national law (for example France's MR-003 or MR-004 reference methodologies) and by the GDPR. They typically involve secondary use of medical records, long-term follow-up, genetic data and small populations in which anonymisation is rarely achievable, so pseudonymisation, a DPIA and a robust research legal basis under Art. 9(2)(j) are essential. Registries maintained by patient organisations or academic consortia raise additional questions of joint controllership and data access governance.

O

Orphan drug designation (ODD)

Orphan drug designation (ODD) is a regulatory status granted to a medicinal product intended to diagnose, prevent or treat a rare, life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition. In the EU, Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 sets the criteria: the condition affects no more than 5 in 10,000 people in the Union (or the product would not be developed without incentives), and there is no satisfactory authorised method, or the product would be of significant benefit over existing methods. Designation is granted by the European Commission on the opinion of the EMA's Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products. In the United States the Orphan Drug Act of 1983 applies to conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 people, with designation by the FDA's Office of Orphan Products Development.

Incentives include protocol assistance and fee reductions, access to the centralised procedure, and ten years of market exclusivity in the EU (seven in the US), extended for paediatric investigations. The EU pharmaceutical package under negotiation proposes to modulate exclusivity periods. Designation is reviewed at the time of marketing authorisation to confirm the criteria are still met.

Rare-disease development has a distinctive data protection profile. Small, well-characterised populations make anonymisation of trial results and registry data difficult, so data is almost always pseudonymised personal data. Genetic data is central, patient organisations and natural history registries act as data sources and sometimes as joint controllers, and global recruitment means extensive international transfers. Publication of results and transparency obligations must be balanced against re-identification risk through careful aggregation.

Is orphan designation the same as marketing authorisation?

No. Orphan designation recognises that a medicine meets criteria for development incentives in a rare condition; it does not authorise sale or establish that the medicine is safe and effective. Sponsors still need the applicable development evidence and marketing-authorisation process. Keep designation status distinct from approval status in trial and investor communications.